You press the thermostat and see 19 °C. The familiar “good citizen” number repeated for years through energy-saving campaigns, rising bills, and climate messaging. It feels almost automatic.
Yet your feet feel cold. Your teenager stays wrapped in a hoodie indoors. Your elderly mother, visiting for the weekend, quietly pulls a blanket over her legs while insisting she’s “fine.” You begin to wonder whether 19 °C is truly a universal comfort point or simply an old guideline we keep repeating without question.
You’re far from alone. Across Europe this winter, doctors, building specialists, and public health professionals have been quietly reassessing their guidance. And the updated recommendation may surprise you.
When the 19 °C Standard Meets Modern Reality
For decades, 19 °C was promoted as the perfect compromise: warm enough to live in, cool enough to cut emissions. Simple and reassuring.
But the research behind that figure dates back to a very different era. Homes were leakier, people were more physically active, and daily routines looked nothing like today’s screen-based lifestyles. Modern houses are better insulated but more airtight, while many people spend long hours sitting still.
An aging population also changes the equation. Older adults and those with circulatory or respiratory conditions often struggle at temperatures once considered acceptable. What felt normal decades ago can now feel uncomfortably cold.
At the same time, energy poverty has surged. Many households keep temperatures at 17–18 °C not by choice, but out of fear of high bills. This raised an uncomfortable question among experts: are homes being under-heated at the expense of health?
What the Evidence Now Shows
Recent surveys in the UK reveal a quiet reality gap. When asked about winter settings, most adults reported keeping living rooms around 21–22 °C, even when they were aware of the long-standing 19 °C advice.
Health data reinforces this shift. Hospital admissions for respiratory illness, cardiovascular issues, and even mental health crises rise during prolonged cold periods—not only in freezing conditions, but in homes kept below roughly 20–21 °C.
The World Health Organization now advises that healthy adults should not live in homes colder than 18 °C, while vulnerable individuals generally require around 20–21 °C to remain safe.
As a result, energy and health experts increasingly converge on a new comfort range: around 20–21 °C in main living spaces. Not excessive, not austere—simply human.
A New Target That Depends on the Room
The updated advice doesn’t call for one fixed temperature throughout the home. Instead, specialists emphasize zoned heating. Living rooms and home offices often benefit from 20–21 °C, while bedrooms typically perform well at 17–19 °C, supporting better sleep.
Less-used spaces can remain cooler, provided they stay dry. This approach replaces the rigid 19 °C rule with a layered strategy: warmer where you live, cooler where you don’t.
Hang it by the shower: the clever bathroom hack that eliminates moisture and keeps your space fresh
Comfort Is More Than a Number
Experts also stress the idea of perceived temperature. Cold walls, drafts near the floor, and uninsulated surfaces can make 20 °C air feel far colder. True comfort depends on the entire building envelope, not just the thermostat reading.
Public messaging that clings to a single sacred number ignores how people actually live. The revised guidance points toward a modest increase where it matters, paired with smarter controls and improved insulation to prevent waste.
Heating More Efficiently at 20–21 °C
The biggest fear around turning the dial up is cost. Energy bills already feel heavy, and every extra degree seems expensive.
Yet heating professionals highlight a counterintuitive truth: maintaining a steady 20–21 °C can be more efficient than constantly cycling between cold and hot. Boilers and heat pumps operate best when they run consistently.
Many specialists now promote low-and-slow heating. This involves setting living areas to 20–21 °C during use, while lowering boiler flow temperatures to around 50–60 °C. Radiators run longer at gentler heat, improving overall efficiency.
Letting Go of the Guilt Around Warmth
For many people, the barrier isn’t technical—it’s emotional. Turning the thermostat above 19 °C can feel like a moral failure.
Health experts push back strongly against this mindset. Long-term exposure to cold homes carries real risks, especially for children, older adults, and those with chronic conditions. Enduring cold indoors is not a virtue.
Meaningful energy savings often come from elsewhere: draft sealing, attic insulation, window upgrades, radiator maintenance, and closing shutters at night. These measures frequently outperform micro-adjusting the thermostat.
From Fixed Rules to Flexible Ranges
The familiar 19 °C rule lingers in old brochures and casual conversation, more habit than evidence. The emerging guidance is more flexible and more realistic.
Experts are not encouraging excess. They are suggesting a shift away from moral ceilings toward thoughtful ranges that reflect health, housing quality, and daily life.
Some households will remain comfortable at 19 °C. Others will find relief at 21 °C. The real change lies in recognizing that comfort, health, and sustainability can coexist—one carefully chosen degree at a time.
- New target range: About 20–21 °C in main living areas for most adults
- Room-by-room approach: Cooler bedrooms and lightly heated unused rooms
- Smarter savings: Insulation, draft-proofing, and stable settings over extreme cuts
